Skip to main content

Choosing the Right Connector for Harsh Environments

By Mark Patrick, Mouser Electronics

Published April 5, 2022

In any system, what's the weakest link?

If you're designing for any kind of harsh environment, it may well be the humble connector. That holds true for any application that needs rugged components, whether it's industrial, mining, transportation, or anything else. In safety-critical systems, any failure can be serious—and potentially fatal.

Connectors are an essential part of any design, whether that is handling analog signals, digital data or power. In many systems, there will be multiple sensors and actuators that must be connected, as well as several sub-systems.

In this article, we'll look at the environmental factors that can cause connector failure, the different kinds of connectors that can survive tough conditions (including the relevant IP ratings), and how you can choose the right connectors for your application—without wasting space and cost by over-specifying.

Protecting Against Dust and Moisture

One of the most likely causes of connector failure is the ingress of moisture or contaminants, such as dust or dirt. Water can get into connectors from the weather, or from cleaning with a hosepipe or other source of flowing water. Cleaning can also introduce chemicals or surfactants, which can corrode electrical conductors, thus at the very least decreasing their ability to carry current, and possibly causing failures.

Moisture can also result from condensation in humid environments, particularly when a device is moved from a cold to a warm environment. Inevitably, water and electricity don't play nice together—and the result can be damaging short circuits.

Dirt or dust that finds its way into a connector can build up over time to form an insulating layer, which can mean there is a poor-quality connection made by a connector. The dust or dirt can also cause overheating.

Ingress protection, or IP, is defined by the IEC's IP standard, IEC 605029, which has become widely used today. This standard uses a two-digit number to show a device's protection against solid objects (first digit) and liquids (second digit), as shown in Table 1.

For example, IP67 means a device is fully dust-tight and protected against temporary immersion in water. Such protection is achieved with heavy-duty seals and grommets, often made from silicone. Multiple seals can provide redundancy, so ingress protection is maintained even if one seal fails.

Table 1

: IEC IP ratings (Source: https://www.mouser.co.za/applications/ingress-protection-matters/ s/)

1st digit

PROTECTION AGAINST SOLID OBJECTS

2nd digit

PROTECTION AGAINST LIQUIDS

0

Not protected

0

Not protected

1

Protected against objects >50 mm

1

Protected against drips

2

Protected against objects >12.5 mm

2

Protected against drips if the 
housing is bent at an angle of 15°

3

Protected against objects >2.5 mm

3

Protected against spray water

4

Protected against objects >1.0 mm

4

Protected against splash water

5

Dust protected

4K

Protected against splash water at increased pressure

6

Dust-tight

5

Protected against jet water

   

6

Protected against strong water jet

   

6K

Protected against strong water jet at increased pressure

   

7

Protected against the effects of 
temporary submersion in water

   

8

Protected against the effects of permanent submersion in water

   

9K

Protected against water during high pressure/steam cleaning

 

In addition to the IEC IP rating, another commonly used system for ingress protection is the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) ratings, often referred to as "NEMA ratings," and are specific to electrical equipment.

There are similarities in how these rating systems categorize the quality and quantity of incursions. Both specifications, however, use different parameters and are, therefore, not equivalent or easily converted. Furthermore, IP ratings are based only on ingress, while NEMA ratings consider other factors, such as corrosion and the physical location of the instrument.

Based on the NEMA 250 standard, "Enclosures for Electrical Equipment (1000 Volts Maximum)," NEMA ratings indicate a device's level of protection, from falling dust to corrosive media, and an enclosure's NEMA rating assumes that it protects against hazardous materials.

NEMA ratings 1–6 and 12–13 apply to non-hazardous locations, while Type 11 deals with corrosion. Type 7–10 qualify enclosures for hazardous (explosive) locations, as well as incorporate other industry guidelines, such as Underwriters Laboratories (UL) Class I or II requirements and Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) standards. Table 2 summarizes the common NEMA ratings.

 

Table 2: NEMA ratings (Source: nema.org)

RATING

LOCATION

PROTECTION AGAINST

NEMA 1

indoors

falling dirt

NEMA 2

indoors

falling dirt, dripping and light splashing water

NEMA 3

indoors/outdoors

falling dirt, windblown dust, rain, sleet, snow

NEMA 3R

indoors/outdoors

falling dirt, rain, sleet, snow, and damage from external formation of ice

NEMA 3S

outdoors

falling dirt, windblown dust, rain, sleet, snow, solid ice (external mechanism remains operable)

NEMA 4

indoors/outdoors

falling dirt, windblown dust, rain, sleet, snow, splashing water, hose-directed water

NEMA 4X

indoors/outdoors

falling dirt, windblown dust, rain, sleet, snow, splashing water, hose-directed water, corrosion, damage from external formation of ice

NEMA 5

primarily indoors

falling dirt, settling airborne dust, lint, fibers, dripping and light splashing water

NEMA 6

indoors/outdoors

falling dirt, hose-directed water, temporary submersion at a limited depth, damage from external formation of ice

NEMA 7

indoors 

internal explosions as by UL Class I, Groups C & D explosion-proof requirements

NEMA 8

indoors/outdoors 

combustion as per UL Class I, Groups C & D explosion-proof requirements

NEMA 9

indoors

dust ignition as per UL Class II, Groups E, F, G requirements

NEMA 10

indoors/outdoors

internal explosions as per MSHA standards

NEMA 11

indoors

dripping corrosive liquids, corrosive gases

NEMA 12

indoors

falling dirt, circulating dust, lint, fibers, dripping and light splashing water

NEMA 13

indoors

falling dirt, circulating dust, lint, fibers, dripping and light splashing water, spraying, splashing, and seeping oil and non-corrosive coolants

 

Other Environmental Hazards

As well as dust and moisture, extremes in temperature can be damaging to connectors—such as the high temperatures experienced in many industrial processes or in mining, where high ambient temperatures underground contribute to extremes experienced by connectors. Frequent cycling of temperatures from low to high, which is likely to occur in many applications, also causes problems.

In sub-zero temperatures, there is also the issue of ice to deal with. As water freezes, it expands, which can result in large forces, possibly damaging connectors and cables. The extra weight of ice can also put strain on connectors.

When specifying connectors, look for an extended temperature range. For example, for fiber optic cables, Molex's LC2 metallic optical connectors (Figure 1) use a metal body that can handle high temperatures up to 150ºC.

 

Figure 1: Molex LC2 Connector

Connectors can also suffer physical damage, whether that is from an impact or from the effect of vibration—which can cause mechanical failure or damage to electrical connections. All-metal bodies can provide the strength to withstand impacts, while thermoplastic shells will resist corrosion, as well as being flame- and chemical-resistant.

Metal construction can also ensure that a connector protects against electrostatic discharge (ESD) and electromagnetic interference (EMI). Another area of mechanical design to consider is strain relief, which ensures any forces applied to the cable or exterior of the connector cannot be passed on to the electrical connection—many connectors provide strain relief as standard.

Suitably rugged connectors will provide the ability to handle vibration, which is defined by standards such as MIL-STD-202. For example, the CeeLok FAS-T Gigabit Ethernet connectors (Figure 2) from TE Connectivity can cope with high degrees of vibration, as well as being IP67-rated, and having an operating temperature range of -65°C to +175°C.

 

Figure 2: TE Connectivity CeeLok Fas-T 10Gb Ethernet Connector

Picking the Right Connector

When choosing a connector, it goes without saying that the first step is to understand the target application and the likely environmental conditions. Plan for the worst case, so you know your connector can withstand whatever is thrown at it.

Once you know what you're aiming for, any necessary approvals, such as IP67, should be checked on the connector's datasheet, which will also state the operational temperature range. Also, consider any other standards that are required, for example in South Africa, the South African Bureau of Standards (SABS) has developed multiple standards that relate to connectors.

Look for connectors with a secure locking mechanism that can withstand vibration, and that provides confirmation it is engaged, with an audible noise or tactile response. There are many types of locking methods, so make sure you pick one appropriate, including planning how often it will be disconnected and connected in its lifetime. Secondary locks, commonly referred to as wedgelocks, will ensure that contacts are held firmly together.

Picking components that have been tested following a relevant standard, such as MIL-STD-202, is vital to ensure they provide the required robustness over their entire lifetime. The standards-based tests use techniques such as 'highly accelerated life tests' (HALT) to accurately simulate real-world conditions, and thus ensure product reliability.

On the other hand, do make sure you don't go too far. The temptation is to over-specify your connectors, but this can mean unneeded costs and space wasted by bulky parts. You may be tempted by the connector with the highest IP rating, when a lower rating is sufficient and cheaper. Similarly, a plastic connector may well be preferable to a more expensive metal connector.

Conclusion

While connectors are sometimes left to last in a system design, they are essential components, and you need to get their selection right. When all the possible permutations are considered, there is a huge range of options, and your best option may well be talking to a distributor who can provide expert technical advice.

For more information as well as listings of thousands of products and their IP ratings, see Mouser's Application and Technology Harsh Environment site.

About the Author

Part of Mouser's EMEA team in Europe, Mark joined Mouser Electronics in July 2014 having previously held senior marketing roles at RS Components. Prior to RS, Mark spent 8 years at Texas Instruments in Applications Support and Technical Sales roles and holds a first class Honours Degree in Electronic Engineering from Coventry University.

Profile Photo of Mark Patrick